The Trooper, Drugs, and the Clintons
A review
To comment go to Treasure
Liberty.
I knew about
Arkansas state trooper L.D. BrownÕs allegations of his eyewitness allegations
of CIA drug smuggling from Central America before I knew his name. The office where I worked subscribed to
the expensive publication for Washington decision makers, the National Journal. I encountered a little item in its
ÒInside WashingtonÓ section, made of copy of it, and wrote a poem about
it. Some three years later, when I
got my own web site, I put up the short article with the accompanying
poem. The analysis in the poem has
held up much better than the rhyme.
I have since learned that the editor of the American SpectatorÕs last name is pronounced ÒTerilÓ
with an accent on the first syllable and not ÒTie-rell.Ó
Here is the full posting from October 4, 1998:
From the
National Journal, 7/29/95, ÒInside WashingtonÓ
The American Spectator is accustomed to raising hackles on the
Left with its ferocious attacks on such liberal icons as Anita Hill and its
relentless pummeling of the Clinton Administration. But insiders say a recent story by
editor-in-chief R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr. was too much even for the conservative
monthlyÕs right-minded staff. Two
top editors threatened to quit when Tyrrell would brook no changes to his long
retelling of a state trooperÕs convoluted yarn linking then-Gov. Bill Clinton
to alleged CIA drug running via a remote Arkansas airstrip. Ultimately, the piece was heavily
rewritten. Still, senior editor
Christopher Caldwell soon jumped to the hot new conservative Weekly
Standard.
My comment: The Weekly Standard had not yet published its first
issue when it was so described. Do
we detect a certain incestuousness
here in the establishment media?
National Jungle
Smugly untroubled
By government drug smuggling,
The National Journal
Shows its true colors
And makes small of R. Emmett Tyrrell.
His yarn convoluted
Is for nice ears unsuited,
So they grind their axe,
Avoid the facts
And keep greasing the skids to hell.
The
subject was on my mind because earlier in the month I had posted the article, ÒSpook Journalist Goulden,Ó on August 11, 1998,
which begins:
The
dirtiest little secret in American public affairs, I have come to believe, is
the penetration, nay, even the virtual takeover of our news media by the
intelligence community. It's hard to think of anything more subversive of our
government and social system. What is even worse, the totally out-of-control
intelligence community, as one would expect of any organization spoiled by huge
sums of money and a complete lack of public scrutiny, is corrupt to the core.
Nowhere
is that corruption more evident than in the heavily documented involvement of
the CIA in the massive illegal drug trade. For starters, please refer to http://humansarefree.com/2015/02/overwhelming-evidence-that-cia-is.html
or http://www.serendipity.li/cia.html (updated links).
There is a very high likelihood that the murder
of Deputy White House Counsel Vincent Foster was linked to the illegal drug
trade, principally through Mena Airport in Arkansas. The widow of Jerry Parks,
murdered in Arkansas a couple of months after Foster, has told British reporter
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard that her husband once returned from a trip to Mena with
Foster with a trunk
full of $100 bills.
Later that
month we brought the Arkansas state trooper into focus with our article ÒRotten Goulden/CornÓ on August 27, 1998. It contains this excerpt from David CornÕs
review-before-publication of L. D. BrownÕs book in The Nation:
Brown's sex-ridden
tales were not entirely unbelievable. Then he hit X-Files territory. He claimed
that in 1984, at Clinton's instigation, he had applied for a job at the C.I.A.
and was inserted by the agency—without training or vetting—into an
operation based in Mena, Arkansas, that smuggled arms to the contras in Central
America and flew cocaine back to Arkansas. And Clinton was in on all of this,
fully in cahoots with Barry Seal, an infamous drug runner, Felix Rodriguez, an
ex-C.I.A. asset and Oliver North's man in El Salvador for contra resupply; and even Vice President George Bush. It's hard-to-swallow
uncorroborated stuff, especially since Brown says he was injected into this
most secretive of operations solely to observe. But Tyrrell swallowed it and
promoted Brown's Mena yarn in his magazine (although other editors there
worried about Brown's credibility on this front) and in Boy Clinton (1996).
We begin that
essay with a quote from Joseph C. Goulden in his
August 8, 1998, Washington Times
CIA-defending review of White-Out: The CIA, Drugs, and
the Press by Alexander
Cockburn and Jeffrey St. Clair:
ÒMr. Cockburn and Mr. Sinclair note mournfully that [Gary] WebbÕs critics
included EVEN such Ômainstream liberalsÕ as his colleague at the Nation, David
Corn.Ó
My
conclusion: ÒSo, has the CIA been
smuggling drugs into the United States from Central America? Designated
ÔconservativeÕ Goulden: ÔThatÕs just left-wing conspiracy talk.Õ
Designated ÔliberalÕ Corn: ÔThatÕs
just right-wing conspiracy talk.ÕÓ
Notice that back
in 1995 the National Journal was
calling BrownÕs recounting of his experience a Òconvoluted yarnÓ while Corn
calls it Òhard-to-swallow uncorroborated stuffÓ and ÒBrownÕs Mena yarnÓ from
ÒX-Files territory.Ó With their characterizations it is clear that the last
thing they want is for you to read BrownÕs story yourself and to make up your
own mind on how credible he is.
L.D.
BrownÕs Book
As it turned out, Regnery Publishing failed to publish the manuscript that
Corn had reviewed and it looked like no one would have a chance to hear the
story straight from the horseÕs mouth.
Seeing no further mention of Brown or his book in the press I soon
forgot about it. Only recently did
it come to my attention that Black Forest Press of San Diego, California had
published the book in April of 1999.
In his text, though, Brown describes the book as Òself-published,Ó so I
assume that that was essentially the case.
In a number of instances Brown uses ÒwhomÓ when ÒwhoÓ would have been
grammatically correct, making it easy for me to believe that the book lacked a
proper publishing company editor. An
astute publishing company would also have probably chosen a better title than Crossfire
(with the subtitle
Witness in the Clinton Investigation)
because that title is so much overshadowed by the classic of the same name by
Jim Marrs on the John F. Kennedy assassination.
The book, even
with its grammatical and some stylistic shortcomings and its poorly chosen
title, is still very much worth reading.
The story of his CIA experiences remains the most powerful and revealing
part of the book by a considerable margin.
Tyrrell had told it before in the prologue of his 1996 Boy Clinton, but there is no substitute
for hearing directly from the source.
The details as he recounts them have a very clear ring of truth, while
anything coming from Tyrrell, better written though it may be, comes tainted
with the Òanti-Clinton conservative partisanÓ label that is sure to make a
large part of the public discount it.
As Brown recounts
it, his joining of the CIA was simply intended as a career-expanding move that
was encouraged by his friend, Governor Bill Clinton, on whose security detail
he worked. Slowly as he goes through
the approval process and his experience with the agency, while still working
for Clinton, he picks up clues that the governor seems to know a lot more than
any mere governor of Arkansas ought to know about the inner workings of the
CIA. The situation comes to climax
when Brown discovers that the airplane he has been riding on with Barry Seal is
bringing cocaine into the country, and, in outrage, he reports his discovery to
Clinton. Clinton shows no surprise
at all. Rather, he responds
defensively, ÒThatÕs LasaterÕs deal,Ó referring to
the high-living Clinton crony, bond dealer Dan Lasater.
That sealed it for
Brown. The course was set for him
that has been followed by many before and since, from Clinton intimate to
Clinton nemesis. ÒFifteen years,
two independent counsels, grand juries and congressional committees later my
wife and I regret the first day we ever met Bill and Hillary Clinton,Ó he
writes in the bookÕs second paragraph.
ÒAlthough we were young and impressionable during the years we were
close to the Clintons,Ó he continues, Òwe knew full well something was deeply
wrong in the way they lived their lives, both personally and politically. Most shocking of all was how they used
their friends as tools for their personal gain. When they were through with them, they
chewed them up and spit them out, discarded as useless and never to be
considered again. When the flavor
of the relationship was gone, the Clintons would leave you in their wake. I saw it happen many times—but I
never thought it would happen to me.Ó
As you would
expect from an Arkansas state trooper, Brown writes at some length of ClintonÕs
lechery, though he says he never saw any indication of the sort of sexual
predation alleged by Paula Jones and Juanita Broaddrick. He does attest to numerous instances of
various forms of threats by the Clintons to enforce silence about their
experience such as attested to by Broaddrick,
Kathleen Willey, Sally Miller Perdue, and others. He even has a chapter entitled ÒThe
Clinton Intimidation Machine.Ó
Amusingly, he
tells us that there was a big run among prominent men in Little Rock when Gennifer FlowersÕ book came out, because Gennifer, he says, was Òa seductress, plain and simple, with
a voice like a nightingale and an alluring sex appeal that I have seen in few
women.Ó He strongly hints that he had been one to partake of her charms. He might not be a purely disinterested
party when he writes, ÒA few people who had as much to lose as Bill drew a
collective sigh of relief when they finished reading that book.Ó
Concerning
HillaryÕs proclivities he states flatly that he never saw any indication that
the woman was anything but heterosexual.
This runs counter to what, in her book, Flowers says Bill told her, what
Perdue has recently told the Daily Mail of London, and what we have written elsewhere. One of the strengths of BrownÕs book, to
my mind, is that, with his law enforcement background, he tends to stick to
what he knows best through his own direct experience and generally avoids
hearsay evidence. One of the things
he describes directly is a public encounter between Hillary and Vince Foster
that would suggest to him that they were romantically involved with one
another.
The suggestion of
romantic ties between Hillary and Foster was, as is well known, alleged by a
number of other state troopers in the American
Spectator article, ÒHis Cheating Heart,Ó by David Brock. Also, a great number of people who have
observed Hillary up close in Little Rock and in Washington have described her
personality in less than complimentary terms. The
ClintonsÕ War on Women, which I reviewed last
December, is full of such
examples. Brown adds to that
literature, and since there is a chance she could be our next president, I feel
an obligation to share some examples with you.
Hillary
on Wheels
Here Brown
describes his first encounter with Hillary Clinton. He is a holdover in the security detail
of outgoing Arkansas governor Frank White, and it is move-in day at the
governorÕs mansion:
As I entered what
we called the back door—actually the kitchen entrance—I saw no one
and proceeded to the breakfast room, a small dining area off the kitchen where
the family took most of their meals.
I immediately saw two women, one rather small with dark hair, the other
with Òcoke-bottleÓ thick glasses, no makeup, and an awful fright-wig of a mop
matched by a stinky scowl that shot bullets right my way. Matching her words with an acerbic tone
she shouted, ÒAnd this door here was open too, and by God I want to know why!Ó
Thinking my days were numbered and convinced this wasnÕt going to be my second
home any more, I was surely not going to be talked to in that way by any of the
Clinton gang. I answered with equal
force and indignation, ÒLady, theyÕre just now moving in today. All the doors and windows are open so
the movers can get their stuff in.Ó With that I turned on my heel and walked
directly back to the guard house determined not to go back in the Mansion until
I received what I expected to be final orders to report back to narcotics duty.
When I reached
[trooper] Barry [Spivey], he asked what they had wanted. I responded with another question,
ÒBarry, who the hell is that bitch with the thick glasses in the breakfast
room?Ó I nearly called 911 as Barry rolled in the floor laughing at my
ignorance until he finally told me, ÒL.D., you have just met Ms. Hillary
Rodham!
The following
passage on pp. 84-85 is so revealing that it must be quoted in its entirety:
Given their
pleasant demeanor, itÕs a given that Hillary didnÕt get her acerbic tongue from
her parents. (Tyrrell would say she picked it up from the sixties campus
radicals. ed.). Hillary could cuss
like a sailor and the levels of her attacks knew no bounds. Characteristic of the way she would run
roughshod over people was the abuse she meted out to the troopers in the
Mansion—that is if you let her.
Hillary
respected people who stood their ground and who would not take her verbal barbs
lying down. I am convinced our
first encounter on moving in day laid the groundwork for our cordial
relationship. She justified
including me in their memorable moments by concluding I wasnÕt like the other
troopers. To her I was far more
intelligent than Òthose idiot guards,Ó as she would call my buddies. She would often tell me she didnÕt want
that Òfucking idiotÓ or such to ever drive her again after a trooper had driven
her somewhere by a route not at all to her approval.
She would tell
troopers this to their face as well.
Typical of the Clintonites who take a slap in the face and then ask for
another, Trooper Mark Allen was prone to crying spells after incurring
HillaryÕs wrath over the most minuscule miscue. Many troopers would stay only one day on
their new assignment at the GovernorÕs Mansion after a run-in with
Hillary. They preferred to return
to highway patrol rather than to suffer the humiliation at the hands of
Hillary.
Hillary
possessed a deep-seated insecurity unlike any other I have ever seen. She felt awkward and inadequate around
the more poised and beautiful people she was forced to interact with as ÒFirst
Lady.Ó She was especially jealous of attractive women. Anne Jansen, a local television anchor
with the CBS affiliate in Little Rock, was her target one day. Anne is a beautiful statuesque blond
with a perennial short haircut.
Hillary, in all seriousness, once asked me about Jansen. ÒWhoÕs that Quaker looking woman over
there?Ó I always thought of Anne as an attractive journalist and not someone on
an oat box but I did tell Hillary who she was.
Hillary never
missed a chance to strike back at those she considered to be inferior. A perfect example came when she was on a
compulsory campaign outing with Bill and me in north Arkansas. It was the county fair and all the
common folk were in town to have their jams and jellies judged and their hands
pumped by all the politicians running for public office.
Hillary had
just shaken the hands of one of the obviously poor families dressed in bib overalls
and cotton dresses. It was time to
go, and we retreated to the travel car none too soon as Hillary broke into her
familiar spiel. ÒGoddam L. D., did
you see that family right out of Deliverance?Ó
alluding to the hillbilly representations of the Burt Reynolds classic
movie. ÒGet me the hell out of
here!Ó she commanded. It sickened
me to see her perpetrate the fraud of asking for votes from people she
obviously detested and to whom she felt superior.
A final
vignette puts the icing on the cake:
In her private
interactions with Bill, one may have observed she was cold toward him to the
point of frigidity. Humiliating him
in front of me seemed to be a sort of sport. My empathy with Bill stemmed from my
miserable marriage and Bill knew it.
But I never experienced the humiliation that Bill did once, as he
ruminated over a lawsuit involving Arkansas and another state. With Hillary in her back seat command
position in the Lincoln, Bill offhandedly asked Hillary, ÒIn lawsuits against
the states, who has original jurisdiction, Hillary?Ó Hillary exploded and
lashed out with, ÒGoddam it Bill, the Supreme Court Bill!!!Ó Adding, ÒL.D. you
knew the answer to that, didnÕt you?Ó After I confirmed her suspicion, she
admonished Bill never to ask a question as stupid as that in front of me
again. Yes,
Hillary—Ms. Personality.
Or ÒMadam PresidentÓ next year?
Slow Learner Brown
Perhaps itÕs
with the wisdom of hindsight or from my perspective in Washington, but, at
times BrownÕs naivetŽ strikies me as rather
touching. As a partisan Republican
himself, throughout his experience with the investigations that fall under the
general category of ÒWhitewater,Ó he exhibits entirely too much faith in the
investigators working first for Robert Fiske and then for Kenneth Starr. He is also favorably impressed with
Michael Chertoff on the staff of the Senate Banking Committee and with
Republican Congressman Dan Burton.
Little does he know. His naivetŽ about the national press is
on display with this passage:
During the presidential
campaign of 1992 I found it amusing that Bill and Hillary would be running for
the White House. I knew that
somehow BillÕs baggage, the women, Mena, the McDougals
and all the rest of their scandal-ridden rise to power in Arkansas that I
witnessed and was a part of would preclude them from ever reaching their
goal. I had miscalculated, in I
assumed the national press would examine his record in Arkansas and all this
would bring him down.
Why the
national press did not do so is perhaps best explained by this passage from my
article, ÒClinton and Cronkite: Odd Couple?Ó of August
27, 1998:
And shouldn't we considerÉall [major mainstream
journalists] to be operatives? From the coverage we have seen of the Vincent
Foster death, the Waco massacre, the Oklahoma City bombing, allegations of CIA
drug smuggling and money laundering, and the explosion of TWA-800, to mention
only major scandals in the Clinton administration, one can hardly escape the
conclusion that MOCKINGBIRD is going stronger
than ever. To see where Clinton fits in, recall that Roger Morris in his book, Partners in Power, the Clintons
and their America, using more than
one anonymous intelligence source, claims that young Bill was actually spying
on the anti-war movement in England for the CIA while pretending to be an
anti-war protestor, an affiliation that explains his meteoric political career
and the charmed life he has led with the American press. Terry Reed in Compromised: Clinton, Bush, and
the CIA and R. Emmett
Tyrrell in Boy Clinton, like Morris connect Clinton to
CIA-sponsored drug smuggling through Mena Airport in northwestern Arkansas.
An even better explanation for the failure of the press
and for the ClintonsÕ mysterious political success is in this passage from the
very recent The ClintonsÕ War on Women
by Roger Stone and Robert Morrow:
The Bushes and Clintons share their
deepest bonds in common with the CIA.
Cord Meyer, Roger Morris, and Christopher Hitchens said that in the
summer of 1968, while at the University of Oxford, young Bill Clinton was recruited by the agency to
infiltrate left-wing anti-war groups in Eastern Europe and snitch on their
activities to the boys at Langley.
ÒI think he was a double,Ó
Hitchens says. ÒSomebody was giving
information to [the CIA] about the anti-war draft resisters, and I think it was
probably him. We had a girlfriend
in common—I didnÕt know then—whoÕs since become a very famous
radical lesbian.Ó
Washington insider Jack Wheeler
related in his 1988 essay ÒHow the Clintons Will Undo McCainÓ how his friend
told him an important nugget about this history of Bill Clinton. He wrote:
Back in the Ô90s, years after he
retired, if Cord Meyer drank a little too much Scotch he would laugh derisively
at those conspiracists who accused Bill Clinton of
being connected with the KGB. They
all darkly point to BillÕs participation in anti-war peace conferences in
Stockholm and Oslo, and his trip to Leningrad, Moscow and Prague while he was
at Oxford. ÒWho could have paid for
this?Ó they ask. ÒIt had to be the
KGB!Ó they claim. Cord would shake
his head. ÒWhat rot—we paid
for it. We recruited Bill the first
week he was at Oxford. BillÕs been
an asset of the Three Bad Words ever since.Ó
L.D. Brown apparently had that much figured out. What he had not figured out at the time
he wrote his book was how much of the ClintonsÕ amazingly charmed political life
was explained by that fact.
David Martin
April 6, 2016
Home Page Column Column 5 Archive Contact