Google, Tool of
the Deep State
Was Vince Foster’s
Murder over Pedophilia?
The work on this article began when I
recently stumbled across a quite well-made video on YouTube by an
outfit called Traditionalist Tolkienist. It had been up since February of 2020, and if
you can believe YouTube’s viewer
count,
very few people had watched it up to that point. I began to wonder how the excellent video had
remained so obscure for more than a year, so, as a first step, I did a search
using the default search engine for my Mac computer, which happens to be
Google, for the video’s title, “Vince Foster: The Deep State’s Worst Murder
Cover-up.”
At this point, you’ll have to take my word
for it, but at the time I first did the search, the video did not come up at
all on Google, no matter how many pages I scrolled through. What did come up were lots of sites similar
to YouTube’s notice under the video that point you to the well-policed Vince
Foster Wikipedia page. They steer you to
conclusions diametrically opposed to what one learns from the video. Over the past weekend, though, I was able to
get Jeff Rense to tout the video on Rense.com, and
now, I see, the video is the fifth thing you find on Google when you search for
it by name. But why isn’t it the first?
Google still dominates the search engine
market, with over 92% of total
searches
worldwide. The next closest one to it is
Bing, with just over 2%. Bing is owned
by Microsoft, so as Deep State partners go, we really shouldn’t expect a much
fairer search from it than from Google, but, in fact, after a scattershot
collection of videos supposedly related to the subject, the title video
actually comes up #2 on Bing, which is about as close to the result of an
honest search as one is likely to get.
The next one to try is Yahoo, with 1.5% of
the market worldwide. What you get is
the same thing as you get with Bing.
The next two, Baidu and YANDEX are
foreign, so we skip over them to DuckDuckGo, with a meager .59% of the search
market. At the top of its results, it’s
identical to Bing and Yahoo. Only as you
scroll down do you notice that the other cited materials are more closely in
accord with the conclusions of the subject video. Taken all in all, though, we may conclude
that in terms of fairness and accuracy, it’s the dominant search engine,
Google, versus the world, and the world is on the losing end.
Those search results made me wonder about
how searches for some other cutting-edge articles of mine, mainly related to
the Foster case, might fare.
The Central
Importance of the Foster Murder
At this point, a small digression is in
order. There are many indications, apart
from how carefully the Vince Foster Wikipedia page is policed, and the
obligatory direction of YouTube to that page under every one of its videos
related to the subject, that there is a larger significance to this matter than
just the violent death of this one White House official. After all, Brett Kavanaugh, the man who
performed Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr’s primary cover-up chores, of which
the Clintons and the Democrats were ostensibly the primary beneficiaries, was
later made a federal judge by President George W. Bush and then a Supreme Court
Justice by President Donald Trump. Kavanaugh
was recommended for that latter position by the man who masqueraded as the primary
critic of the government in the case, Christopher Ruddy. Ruddy, in turn, has been made rich and fairly
famous as the CEO of Newsmax and has become a crony of not just Trump, but of
Bill and Hillary Clinton, as well. Another
member of Starr’s staff, John Bates was also made a federal judge by President
Bush. Bush made another Starr staffer, Alex Azar, general counsel
of the Department of Health and Human Services, where he was in the right
position to see to it that the investigation of the anthrax attacks didn’t
wander off track. Then, President Trump
made Azar the Secretary of Health and Human Services just in time for the
beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Solomon Wisenberg was another member of Starr’s staff. As Wikipedia puts it, “Since the launch of the
investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election by
Special Counsel Robert Mueller in May 2017, Wisenberg
has made numerous media appearances on NBC, Fox News, MSNBC, CBS, CNN, NPR,
PBS, and in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal and other national
publications.” Fans of Fox’s Laura
Ingraham will recognize him immediately.
For the Senate Whitewater Committee, which
looked into the Foster death, the lead Republican counsel was Michael Chertoff
and the lead Democratic counsel was Richard Ben-Veniste. Chertoff was head of the criminal division of
the U.S. Department of Justice at the time of the events of 9/11 and he
succeeded Tom Ridge in 2005 to become the second Secretary of the Department of
Homeland Security. Ben-Veniste, who first rose to prominence working for the
Watergate special prosecutor, was later appointed to the 9/11 Commission.
Comparing the
Search Engines
Now, let’s see what we find when we search
for my May 2017 article, “Seth Rich Equals Vince Foster?” Perhaps I overlooked it when I first searched
for it on Google, but now the fourth thing that comes up is a Russian site’s
copy
of the article. I didn’t know that I had
fans in Russia, but I suppose the clever folks at Google think this is a good
way to taint the evidence that I present.
Only when you scroll to the second page do you get Archive 5 of my home
page, which lists the article among quite a few others. With Bing, by contrast, my article on my own web
site is the first thing that comes up.
Nowhere can you find the version that appeared on the Russian web
site. With Yahoo and DuckDuckGo, it’s
the same thing, which really seems to be what any honestly constructed
algorithm would come up with.
DuckDuckGo, with its tiny percentage of the search market, stands out in
one way in this instance, though. The
other related articles that appear get you pretty quickly into the Deep State’s
nefarious world. To take one example, we
find there the very latest developments related to “The Strange Death
of Philip Haney,”
very nearly the last thing that the folks at Google would want you to learn
about. Another intriguing site that
comes up on DuckDuckGo also happens to come up with the Bing search, which we
shall talk about later.
Next, we try the March 2017 article,
“Where’s the Press on Vince Foster’s Death?”
What Google gives you, for the most part, is nothing but a big blizzard
of pro-suicide propaganda sites. Only
when scrolling to the sixth page of listed web sites do we find my article as
published on the popular libertarian web site, LewRockwell.com. Of
some interest is the fact that at the bottom of the first search page, Google
steers us to Chris Ruddy’s C-Span presentation on the Foster
case, playing his youthful role as the leading critic of the government in the
Foster case. The presentation is thoroughly
damning of the government investigation.
Unlike me, though, Ruddy pulls his punches when
it comes to criticism of the press. That
should have been a pretty good clue at the time that he was not genuine…and the
fact that his book, The Strange Death
of Vincent Foster, was published by
the Free Press, a division of Simon and Schuster.
With Bing and Yahoo, the first thing that
comes up is the LewRockwell.com version of my article, followed by some
hard-hitting critical videos on the Foster death. The only difference with DuckDuckGo is the
order of the web sites, with the videos first and my article on LewRockwell.com
second.
The next article we search for, as its
title would indicate, could easily be construed as more incriminating of
President Trump than of the Democrats, lest we think that the Deep State and
the Democrats were nearly synonymous, and that Google is just a Democratic
Party organ. That is my November 2018
article, “Daniel Best: Trump’s Vince Foster?”
Once again, Google provides its usual volley of Foster-killed-himself
web sites. None of them have anything to
do with the key title character, Daniel Best.
Only at the bottom of the second search page does my article come up, as
published on Heresy Central. With Bing, Yahoo, and DuckDuckGo, by
contrast, that web site is the first thing that comes up, which is clearly what
should be the case with a non-agenda-driven, honest search engine.
Google at Its
Worst on Charlottesville
At this point we take a little detour to
have a look at the search results for what I think is one of my most revealing
articles, one which has nothing to do with Vince Foster’s death. That is my September 2017 article, “The
Charlottesville Operation.” After perusing
the fifth page of Google’s search results looking for the article, I gave
up.
With Bing, the article as it appears on my
web site, is the first thing that comes up.
The second thing to appear is the same article as published on Jim
Fetzer’s web site. The seventh is the
article as it appears on Heresy Central, and the eighth is Kevin Barrett’s
interview of me concerning the article, also accessed through Heresy
Central. The contrast with Google could
hardly be starker. Unlike Google, Bing
also steers readers to other articles that reach similar conclusions to mine,
that is, that what happened in Charlottesville at the protest over the removal
of the statue of General Robert E. Lee from a public park was really quite
different from what we have been told by the press.
But then, perhaps Yahoo deserves the award
for the greatest contrast with Google.
With Yahoo, “The Charlottesville Operation” article occupies the first
three places in their search, first on the Exploring Real History web site,
then on Fetzer’s page, and then on Heresy Central. The Barrett interview comes up on their
second page, but that’s a bit redundant, because the Heresy Central version of
the article links to the Barrett interview right at the top of the page. The Yahoo search also brings up a number of
articles pointing to the same conclusions that I reach in my article. With DuckDuckGo, the results are much the
same, revealing very clearly that the dominant search engine, Google, is
engaging in a quite conscious cover-up of this topic.
Pedophilia?
This brings us to our final search, for
the December 2016 article, “Was Vince Foster’s Murder PizzaGate-Related?” It’s particularly good as an evaluator of the
usefulness of a search engine, because it’s more than an article title but just
the sort of question that an inquisitive person my pose to a search engine. How helpful, one might ask, is the search
engine in steering the person to an answer to the question?
Actually, my article turns up in fourth
place with the Google search, but it is very lonesome there, indeed. Most of what comes up is an almost frantic
litany of articles denying that there could possibly be anything to those
leaked John Podesta emails that could hardly be interpreted any other way than
as references to acts of pedophilia.
With Bing, fitting the pattern of the
previous articles, “Was Vince Foster’s Murder PizzaGate-Related?”
is the first thing that comes up. As
with Google, though, it’s out of step, generally, with virtually all the other
hits. It’s almost the same with Yahoo,
with my article #1, but awfully lonesome with the company it’s in, with this
one exception on the first page, “The Vince Foster
Case: 101 Peculiarities Surrounding the Death of Vincent Foster” in the Progressive
Review. It’s a solid examination of the case, but it predates the Pizzagate matter, so there’s nothing in it about
pedophilia. DuckDuckGo is generally the
same as Bing and Yahoo, although if you scroll long enough you’ll come across “Vince Foster
Murder Evidence Released,” from Scoop, a web site based in New Zealand. Like the Progressive Review article,
it’s solid on the Foster case, but it came out in 2003, so it long predates any
Pizzagate revelations and has nothing to do with
pedophilia.
For that subject, we now return to the
previously referenced web site that turned up on DuckDuckGo and also on Bing
when we searched “Seth Rich Equals Vince Foster.” The article is intriguingly titled, “The Doorknob
Sacrifices; A Black-Sun Ritual: 12 Celebrity ‘Suicides’ related to Pedophilia
Cover-up.” I will leave it to readers to draw their own
conclusions as to whether Vince Foster might have been killed because he was
believed to be a threat to reveal pedophilia in high places. One thing is certain, you’ll never get within
miles of such a subject if you’re using Google to do your online searching.
David Martin
June 25, 2021
To comment, go to Heresy Central.
Home Page Columns Column 5 Archive Contact